RPAS Studio V1.1.1

User Manual — Digital Research and Engineering Workspace

Product: RPAS Studio — Resonant Photonic Acoustic System
Release covered: V1.1.1
Manual edition: 0.1 — evidence-constrained draft
Document date: November 9, 2026
Publisher: HaloCyberLife
Audience: Authorized users and technical readers
Document state: Public-facing draft; feature-level verification remains open

IMPORTANT — DEVELOPMENT STATUS. RPAS Studio V1.1.1 is an actively developed browser-based research and engineering software platform. A screen labeled OPERATIONAL does not mean a physical experiment was conducted, an instrument was calibrated, or a scientific result was independently validated. Treat digital reference demonstrations, simulated or illustrative plots, recorded executions, integrity-checked files, and physical measurement evidence as different categories.

READ BEFORE USING. This edition is based on documented project information supplied by the project owner, not an authenticated source-code or in-app acceptance audit. Items labeled NEEDS VERIFICATION must be checked against a current authenticated screenshot, source code, or controlled test before the manual is called a fully verified operational reference. No feature should be assumed functional merely because its navigation item exists.

1. Introduction and scope

RPAS Studio provides a browser interface for investigating digital models and organizing engineering workflows. The currently described interface includes dashboard information, approved digital reference examples, experiment configuration views, research workspaces, history, models, physics descriptions, comparisons, telemetry, visualization, evidence verification, and release information. Access and functionality can vary by role and current release.

This document explains what users can safely infer from each area, where the described workflow is confirmed, and where behavior has not been verified. It does not certify the accuracy of a particular digital model, the availability of experimental equipment, or the success of a physical experiment.

How to read feature labels

• DOCUMENTED — Behavior or interface content identified in the supplied project history. This does not automatically mean that a fresh live test passed.
• PARTIAL / RESTRICTED — UI exists or is described, but a step or service may be restricted, disabled, incomplete, or dependent on role.
• NEEDS VERIFICATION — Current control behavior, persistence, permissions, outputs, or availability cannot be confirmed from the available evidence.
• PLANNED — Future work, not a present capability.

Recommended first-use path

1. Open the authorized RPAS Studio URL.
2. Review the visible account context and any access restrictions.
3. Read Dashboard status labels without equating them with scientific validation.
4. Select an approved digital reference (for example, PrecisionPulse) if offered.
5. Preview the reference; save only if the workspace control is available and authorized.
6. Inspect Models, Physics, and any read-only visualizations.
7. Avoid treating an illustration, sample result, or unavailable operation as a measured experiment.

Screenshot S01: Full Dashboard after authorized access. Caption: RPAS Studio V1.1.1 Dashboard and available navigation; visibility varies by role.

2. System access and user roles

2.1 Open RPAS Studio

1. Open the RPAS Studio web address provided on the official HaloCyberLife website or by an authorized administrator.
2. Complete the authentication step if prompted. Do not bypass access controls.
3. Review the current development-status notice and visible account role.
4. Open Dashboard to see available controls and reported system status.
5. If a page is unavailable, note the visible error and consult Chapter 15.

DOCUMENTED: RPAS Studio is browser-based and access can be restricted. NEEDS VERIFICATION: the current permanent public entry URL, exact authentication prompts, and role assignment flow.

Screenshot S02: Authorized sign-in or first accessible application screen. Caption: Access to RPAS Studio depends on current permissions and availability.

2.2 USER access

The USER context offers approved digital reference examples and interfaces specifically made available to users. It does not automatically grant access to private research, administrative functions, underlying engineering data, or unrestricted experimental execution.

2.3 OWNER access

OWNER is the restricted engineering and administrative context. Private experiments, development workflows, and protected evidence remain separate from explicitly published USER resources.

NEEDS VERIFICATION: the current role-specific control matrix and each action's permissions must be checked before publication of detailed procedural claims.

2.4 Development-stage availability

Some visible controls can be incomplete, disabled, or temporarily unavailable. Report the actual message or state shown by the application; do not assume an unavailable feature completed an operation.

3. Navigation and interface map

The following entries are documented as areas of the V1.1.1 interface. An entry in this table is not a claim that its entire workflow passes current testing.

Some areas may be hidden, disabled, moved, or differently labeled across releases and USER and OWNER views. Follow the actual authenticated interface, not a speculative menu path.

Screenshot S03: Full navigation with USER role identified. Caption: Menu availability is permission- and build-dependent.

4. Dashboard and system health

The Dashboard is the entry point for understanding the present application state and approved references. Described components include Active Research Reference, Digital Reference, and Engineering Inspector.

4.1 Health indicators

Important: An observed application screen displayed SYSTEM DEGRADED while some subsystems reported ONLINE. The overall badge is driven by reported dashboard.system.status; the precise degraded-state cause is still under investigation. Do not claim a server crash or a determined root cause without diagnostics.

4.2 How to inspect a Dashboard status

1. Read the overall SYSTEM badge.
2. Read ENGINE, TELEMETRY, EVIDENCE and RELEASE independently.
3. Identify which area is unavailable or unknown.
4. Note the current page, visible text, release label, and local time.
5. If a subsystem shows OFFLINE, do not try to force operation or reinterpret the label as a successful run.
6. Report inconsistencies to the administrator with a screenshot; do not paste authentication tokens into reports.

DOCUMENTED: the set of status labels and the distinction between server availability and application health. NEEDS VERIFICATION: exact logic behind all underlying statuses and how the user can refresh them.

Screenshot S04: Dashboard with degraded banner and service indicators. Caption: DEGRADED is an application health classification, not automatically a stopped Linux service.

5. Approved digital references

5.1 What a digital reference is

A digital reference is an approved example designed for software exploration and engineering orientation. PrecisionPulse — Industrial Monitoring Demo is a named reference in the Dashboard's Active Research Reference section. Its appearance does not mean that industrial machinery, sensors or physical signals were measured during your session.

5.2 Select and preview

1. Go to Dashboard.
2. Find Active Research Reference.
3. Select PrecisionPulse — Industrial Monitoring Demo, if present.
4. Use the available preview or reference-selection control.
5. Inspect the Digital Reference status and Engineering Inspector descriptions.
6. Identify whether presented data are labeled sample, simulated, illustrative, or recorded. If unspecified, treat origin as UNKNOWN.

DOCUMENTED: the named reference and existence of selection, preview and saving concepts. NEEDS VERIFICATION: exact button names, preview payload, visual transitions, and whether selections persist after reload.

5.3 Preview versus save

Preview means inspecting or loading a reference for evaluation in the current interface. Save to workspace implies a request to retain a copy or configuration in a user-associated area. A preview alone must not be described as permanently saved. A click on Save alone does not prove persistence unless confirmation and later retrieval are verified.

1. Preview the chosen reference first.
2. If a workspace save control is enabled for your role, activate it.
3. Observe any displayed confirmation or error.
4. Check the relevant workspace or My Experiments area for an entry, if implemented.
5. Reopen the entry to verify persistence; otherwise classify the save as UNCONFIRMED.

NEEDS VERIFICATION: storage location, saved fields, duplicate handling, quotas, retention period, and whether the save control works in the current application.

Screenshot S05: Active Research Reference selector. Caption: Selecting a reference is not the same as executing a physical experiment.

Screenshot S06: Preview and save controls, with resulting notification. Caption: Verify whether save confirmation corresponds to a retrievable record.

6. Models and public demonstrations

The Models area is intended for digital references and public examples. A model is a software representation subject to assumptions, parameter ranges and implementation limits. Treat its graphics as digital-model output unless separately identified and documented as recorded data.

1. Open Models if visible.
2. Select an approved public example.
3. Read its description, model assumptions and available parameters.
4. Determine whether the displayed result is a preview, simulated result, loaded execution record, or physical measurement with provenance.
5. Avoid interpreting a missing model asset or a disabled control as an implicit positive result.

DOCUMENTED: Models area and approved examples. NEEDS VERIFICATION: exact list of models, link behavior, file assets, calculation rules and completeness. Missing scientific reference resources should be reported UNAVAILABLE, not silently replaced with invented references.

Screenshot S07: Models catalog. Caption: Available public models, with assumptions and build-specific availability.

7. Experiment Designer and configuration

The Experiment Designer is the interface for specifying engineering inputs. These may represent model parameters, excitation or geometry settings, constraints, and run conditions depending on the selected experiment. Do not assume any particular parameter or unit exists until the current screen and source confirm it.

7.1 Safe configuration procedure

1. Open Experiment Designer if your role permits access.
2. Identify the selected model or experiment context.
3. Review the visible field labels, units, default values and constraints.
4. Enter only values supported by the interface and model documentation.
5. Distinguish a draft configuration from a submitted run.
6. Use a save action only where one is visible and enabled; verify that the result can be found again.
7. Before using configuration-derived outputs in a report, capture parameter values, model version, timestamp and source classification.

PARTIAL / NEEDS VERIFICATION: supported fields, numerical bounds, validation messages, save/restore behavior, schema and authorization. This manual intentionally contains no invented units, defaults or execution parameters.

Screenshot S08: Experiment Designer with real field labels and any validation notices. Caption: Input parameters are configuration choices, not proof of experimental operation.

8. Run Experiment — execution and restrictions

A Run Experiment tab does not establish that the current user can launch a backend job or physical test. Execution may depend on authentication, role, service availability, protected resources and implemented workflow.

1. Open Run Experiment only if available to your role.
2. Check the current system status and any warnings.
3. Review the selected configuration and its scientific source classification.
4. Do not treat an available or clickable button as evidence that an execution occurred.
5. If the interface indicates unavailability, denied authorization, missing resources or incomplete integration, stop and record that condition.
6. Only call a run successful when a durable execution identifier and relevant recorded result are actually provided and can be independently inspected.

NEEDS VERIFICATION: precise run-start controls, backend execution semantics, job states, identifiers, cancellation and results. Not established: any physical equipment integration or experimental demonstration in this deployment.

Screenshot S09: Run Experiment page in its actual enabled or restricted state. Caption: Availability and role restrictions determine which operations can be performed.

9. Research Workbench

The Research Workbench is described as a place for private hypotheses, research drafts and related engineering notes. Some workspace capabilities may be intentionally disabled; an unavailable control should be identified as such.

1. Navigate to Research Workbench, if visible.
2. Check whether drafting, saving, editing or opening records is enabled for your role.
3. If access or saving is disabled, do not assume text was persisted.
4. Separate hypotheses and speculative research ideas from observed or verified evidence.
5. Avoid placing confidential OWNER material into a USER-facing document or public example.

PARTIAL / RESTRICTED. NEEDS VERIFICATION: currently enabled editing, autosave, explicit save, isolation, quotas, export/import and retention. Older project plans have mentioned workspace quotas and retention policies; this manual does not state them as current V1.1.1 facts.

Screenshot S10: Workbench access state. Caption: Private research functions may be restricted by design.

10. Telemetry and visualization

Telemetry may show reported status, execution-related values or archived monitoring data. Visualization may display digital cockpit graphics, dynamic waveforms or model representations. Neither should be called a physical measurement without documented instrument origin and traceable acquisition metadata.

10.1 Reading telemetry

1. Open Telemetry if available.
2. Identify whether the panel shows live service state, historical record, simulation, or placeholder content.
3. Look for a record identifier, timestamp, units, source and status.
4. If any are absent, report that the provenance is incomplete or unknown.
5. Do not infer a recorded physical value from animation or an illustrative trace.

10.2 Reading visualization

1. Open Visualization.
2. Look for labels distinguishing illustrative graphics, generated numerical output, historical replay and recorded measurements.
3. Compare visual quantities only when units, time bases and data provenance match.
4. Treat unlabelled animations as illustrative until verified otherwise.

NEEDS VERIFICATION: exact panels, refresh cadence, data connectors, timestamps, downloadable outputs and mappings between recorded values and graphics.

Screenshot S11: Telemetry panel. Caption: Source, timestamps and provenance govern the interpretation of reported values.

Screenshot S12: Visualization cockpit. Caption: A rendered waveform alone does not establish a measured physical signal.

11. Evidence verification and scientific provenance

Evidence verification concerns the integrity and identity of a specific record. It is not interchangeable with independent evaluation of the physical claims made in that record.

11.1 Evidence categories

Integrity is not scientific validation. A digest match can help show that data have not changed relative to a trusted digest, but it does not prove an instrument was present, that a measurement is accurate, that the model is physically correct, or that a third party has reproduced the result. A SHA-256 digest by itself is not a digital signature or proof of who authored a record.

11.2 Interpret verification labels

• EVIDENCE VERIFIED: an identified record has passed the application's implemented verification condition. Identify the actual record and algorithm before reporting details.
• VERIFICATION FAILED: an attempted verification did not meet the implemented condition. Preserve error context and avoid overwriting the source record.
• EVIDENCE UNKNOWN: no verified result has been established for the displayed context; this is not automatically failure.

Project code excerpts show that a verification UI can switch between VERIFIED and FAILED based on an evidence.verified value and display a SHA-256 matching message. NEEDS VERIFICATION: how records are generated, their canonicalization, what is embedded, how the comparison is performed, and whether the UI has a separate UNKNOWN state when no record is loaded.

11.3 Checking an evidence record

1. Find the evidence panel on the active page.
2. Check whether a specific record is loaded.
3. Read VERIFIED, FAILED or UNKNOWN without replacing the displayed result with an assumption.
4. Capture the evidence identifier and source context if visible.
5. Distinguish integrity verification from measurement provenance and scientific validation in any publication.

Screenshot S13: Evidence panel with no record loaded. Caption: Unknown evidence state is not verification failure.

Screenshot S14: Verification panel with a loaded record. Caption: Integrity checks apply to identified data, not automatically to underlying physical claims.

12. History, My Experiments and Compare

History and My Experiments indicate areas for past or user-associated records. Compare suggests reviewing results or configurations together. Their complete current behaviors have not been verified.

12.1 Reviewing a saved item

1. Open History or My Experiments, whichever is visible.
2. Look for an identifiable record, time, model, creator/owner context and source classification.
3. Open an entry only through authorized UI controls.
4. Verify whether the entry contains a configuration, preview, recorded digital run or physical observation.
5. Do not treat an empty history panel as evidence that all old records have been deleted; release and permissions may affect visibility.

12.2 Comparing items

1. Open Compare if present.
2. Select only items offered by the interface.
3. Determine whether the comparison uses the same variables, units, model version and data origin.
4. Do not claim a numerical difference is physically meaningful unless data comparability and measurement basis have been established.

NEEDS VERIFICATION: current record retrieval, retention, owner isolation, deletion, import/export, record schemas and comparison controls.

Screenshot S15: History and record details. Caption: A saved record needs an explicit source type.

Screenshot S16: Compare interface. Caption: Comparisons require compatible models, units and provenance.

13. Physics and scientific references

The Physics section should explain the scientific basis and limits of available digital models. A credible model description states its assumptions, governing equations when appropriate, constraints, expected inputs and output units, numerical methods, cited scientific sources, and what is not represented.

1. Open Physics if available.
2. Read the model description and source references.
3. Check whether the scientific resources are accessible and correctly attributed.
4. If references are missing, regard the scientific provenance as INCOMPLETE, not implicitly established.
5. Do not conflate theoretical plausibility, software model output and physical confirmation.

NEEDS VERIFICATION: actual V1.1.1 equation set, model provenance citations, any external-reference links, and the validated range of each model. This manual makes no claims of new physical discoveries or quantitative RPAS performance.

Screenshot S17: Physics panel with citations. Caption: Model assumptions and citations should be inspected before reporting scientific conclusions.

14. Release information and versioning

The Release section communicates the application's version or readiness state. The documented target is V1.1.1, but the application must be checked to establish its actual running build at a particular moment.

1. Open Release.
2. Record the visible version/build information.
3. Record the visible release/version identifier if available.
4. Do not assume the release label certifies scientific validation.
5. Report inconsistent build or readiness labels for administrative review.

NEEDS VERIFICATION: precise fields, build artifact hashes, release approvals, release notes and current release metadata. A version label is not a validation certificate.

Screenshot S18: Release panel. Caption: Software release status is distinct from scientific certification.

15. Troubleshooting

Safe diagnostic report: include page URL (without access tokens), release label, role, action attempted, visible error, local time, and cropped screenshot without sensitive material. Never share passwords, one-time codes, access JWTs, authorization headers, private record payloads or OWNER data in public bug reports. Browser Content Security Policy (CSP) can block unapproved scripts or resources; do not disable CSP as a workaround.

16. Security, privacy and integrity

RPAS Studio is described as using access controls, protected roles and browser security measures such as Content Security Policy. Cloudflare Access protects the public-facing entry points identified above. Application role authorization and record-level access must also be enforced on the server; a hidden navigation item alone is not access control.

• Authenticate only via approved entry points.
• Respect USER versus OWNER permissions.
• Do not attempt to enumerate private records or invoke unsupported functions.
• Avoid exposing access tokens, session cookies, evidence payloads or private telemetry.
• Treat save and export operations as unverified until the current implementation confirms them.
• Never disable browser security or authentication to make a blocked feature appear to work.

NEEDS VERIFICATION: exact CSP policy, backend authorization tests, retention/deletion rules, data encryption, backup policy and incident response procedures. None are certified by this manual.

17. Known limitations and open verification register

The following items are not asserted to work in every current build:

Known constraints: current role differences, restricted workspace capabilities, unavailable scientific reference resources, no verified physical measurements supplied for this manual, and incomplete independent inspection of the live UI.

18. Future development — not present functionality

Possible future documentation and engineering improvements include: expanding each chapter with verified screenshots, in-app contextual help, reliable record provenance labeling, published model assumptions, automated accessibility testing, verified role matrices, comprehensive user acceptance tests and versioned documentation. These are proposals, not a declaration that the features are implemented or scheduled.

The V1.1.1 stable-release boundary should be preserved during future development. This manual does not authorize changes to application services, OWNER components, or private evidence.

19. Glossary

Application health: Reported operational condition of the RPAS application; separate from hosting service uptime.
Approved reference: Published digital example authorized for users to inspect.
Cloudflare Access: Identity-aware gateway controlling access to protected sites.
CSP (Content Security Policy): Browser security policy limiting permitted resource and script sources.
Configuration: Chosen parameters or settings; not evidence of successful execution.
Digital model: Software representation of some defined process subject to assumptions and constraints.
Evidence record: Identifiable stored material submitted or displayed for inspection.
Evidence integrity: Whether record content matches the expected checking representation.
Experimental validation: Evidence-supported evaluation that a claimed result reflects the phenomenon and conditions described.
Frontend: User-visible browser application.
OWNER: Privileged role for specifically authorized private engineering functions.
Preview: Temporary inspection of a reference without a guarantee of saved persistence.
Provenance: Origin, processing and custody details required to interpret a record or result.
Release: Identified software version and readiness information.
SHA-256: Cryptographic hash algorithm often used in integrity checks; a hash is not itself proof of scientific validity or authorship.
Simulation: Computed behavior of a model under defined assumptions.
Telemetry: Reported status or collected time-dependent data, whose origin must be documented.
USER: Restricted role with access to explicitly approved resources.
Verification: An explicit check against a stated criterion; not necessarily physical validation.
Visualization: Graphical rendering that may represent simulation, records or illustrative output.

Appendix A. User-facing software architecture and scientific boundaries

RPAS Studio exposes a browser interface for digital-model exploration, reported application status, experiment-related records, and evidence-oriented views. Its menus and data depend on the current release and authorized role.

• The interface displays information but does not, by itself, prove that an instrument performed a measurement.
• A digital reference is an approved software example, not a validated physical result.
• Telemetry requires documented data provenance before it can be interpreted as experimental measurements.
• An integrity check may verify that a digital record matches an expected representation; it does not certify physical correctness.
• USER and OWNER resources have separate permission boundaries.

Internal hosting arrangements, server processes, storage paths, and infrastructure transitions are outside the scope of this public manual. They belong in restricted OWNER technical documentation.

Appendix B. Screenshot checklist and publication rules

Insert screenshots S01–S18 at the chapter markers after checking they are from the same identified build and role. Redact personal data, tokens, private OWNER records and inaccessible experiments. Annotate each capture with release/build identifier, role and date. Prefer actual captures over reconstructed mockups. If no verified screenshot exists, retain the caption as a clearly labeled editorial placeholder rather than a fabricated screenshot.

Suggested footer integration

Place a visible User Manual link in the approved application or website navigation, opening a separately served documentation page such as user-manual.html. This is an integration proposal, not a claim about the current footer source or route. Before integration, check that the page exists at the chosen public path and that the link does not expose protected resources.

Editorial sign-off criteria

This manual may be styled and linked in an authorized website environment as an evidence-constrained edition. Before labeling it the fully verified official operating manual, resolve V-01–V-14, replace placeholders with authorized images, check screen/control terminology, and perform OWNER-approved editorial and security review.